There are very few things uglier than blind patriotism. To borrow a line from Irish playwright G.B.Shaw – who had been known to fling a ball or two at his local peach basket – it is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it.
So in theory Australia Day has the potential to be a day that embodies all the worst qualities of our peoples. Yet, for the most part, it does nothing of the sort. Rather than an exhibition of Australian pride, the day has almost become a showcase for the all little subtleties that make up Australian culture; successes and foibles alike.
This is epitomised in the tradition of the Australia Day BBQ. The language of a good barbecue is universal, irrespective of what you do for a living or what city you’re in. Well, except Sydney, which is full of obnoxious uppity man-purse-wearing fuckers. I’m joking of course, I’m sure there are some of you who don’t wear purses. But in most places round the country, the same scene plays out over and over.
Firstly, that Shaq-sized hole in the ozone we’ve worked so hard to develop ensures a nice dry heat throughout the day; it’s not a barbecue until your skin is sizzling almost as much as the snags. It’s not a barbecue until there are a cluster of men gathered around the snags, dropping science on the perfect way to extract flavour from a bunch of Woolworths sausages. It’s not a barbecue until you’ve committed at least one act of intense laziness – whether it be stealing another man’s beer because yours was on the other side of the esky or staying in the pool three hours too long because you couldn’t be fucked getting out.

And just like there are certain common threads, there are also some unwritten laws that aren’t to be broken. To quote a somewhat more contemporary dude, certain shit you just don’t do. You don’t bring along fancy bottle of Shiraz: it might be a great drop, but on this day tinnies of VB taste much sweeter. You don’t dress up. And you most definitely do not invite a vegetarian. Now look, I like a nice glass of red as much as the next man, I’m not averse to a crisp shirt and a couple of my very closest friends are vegetarian. But a barbecue with a shiraz-swiller, a dude in a tie and a vegetarian just wouldn’t function – Australia Day is the classic case of the sum being greater than the parts, as long as the parts are willing to play their role.
So it was surely no accident that it was on this past Australia Day, laying drunk on a deck littered with empty bottles of cheap beer, that it finally dawned on me that the Boomers will forever be doomed to mediocrity until they too develop their own sense of transcendent identity.
[An aside: One of the first rules of writing is to introduce your subject early on. It’s a cardinal sin to be writing about one thing (say, basketball) and spend the first five paragraphs blathering on about something else (say, barbecues). Here’s why; everyone interested in basketball tends to stop reading well before paragraph 5, and given this is a basketball blog, that leaves only some poor American bastard who was eager to learn how to put on a gen-u-wine Ausssee BBQ. Oh well, live and learn.]
To hammer the point home, I’d invite you to join me in a game of word association, working through some of the national teams that have had success in international ball. Below are my responses; feel free to come up with your own.
Argentina…toughness
Spain…skill
Yugoslavia…shooting
Greece…defense
Australia…green-and-gold?
Maybe someone can come up with a better association, but I just can’t see it. This team just hasn’t had any sense of identity ever since Gaze retired. In the Gaze days, you could probably have answered “shooting”. But really, the Boomers were never going to be able ride shooting to a medal. Not when the Yugoslavs and the Lithuanians have had that particular identity on lockdown since anyone can remember. And the current incarnation of the Boomers is certainly no threat to eclipse the best shooting squads.
There are two aspects that make this really frustrating. For one, the team finally has enough top-end talent to theoretically challenge for a medal. But even more frustrating is the fact that Australian teams in other sports have never had a problem forging their own identity. Often, this simply entails being the team that wins with physicality and grit, as was the case for the Socceroos in the 2006 FIFA World Cup. But no-one can convince me that the Boomers can ever match the toughness and physicality of the Argentines, the Greeks or even the Coach-K-coached USA squad. So what the hell are they?

It doesn’t help that the best players on the team are so stylistically disparate. Andrew Bogut, Patty Mills, David Andersen…there might not be a shared trait between the three – a system catered to Bogut would make it tough for the other two to thrive, and vice-versa. This disparity is no accident. In a country whose basketball league has become a laughing stock, where the sport in general carries the stigma of being too ‘soft’ or too ‘American’, it’s no surprise that players have to forge their own sense of style with little in the way of examples.
I doubt we’ll know what a prototypical Aussie baller is any time soon, and the stylistic difference between our best players will likely remain vast. But that shouldn’t prevent the team as a whole from developing its own national identity. It’s difficult to know what to prescribe for the Boomers. Perhaps the solution will come in the form of a great ‘glue guy’. Someone who’ll be able to bridge the gap between a Bogut and a Mills; someone who’ll be able to lead the team in one direction. Or maybe that direction will come in time from Brett Brown, who has done his apprenticeship under the best coach in the NBA; certainly the best at instilling a common ethos amongst his players.
In any case, until the Boomers undergo a seismic change that imbues them with their very own understanding of what it means to represent Australian basketball, this team is bound to fail. The USA, with a team far more talented than we could ever hope to field, discovered this so emphatically in the first part of the decade.
A team that stands for nothing will not stand up when it counts.
Nevertheless, I’m not entirely pessimistic about the future of the team. At least the Boomers are still working with a clean slate, still able to write their own history. At least they aren’t already forever tainted as a soft team that perennially underperforms. In other words, at least we aren’t the French!
Tags: Australia Day, Australian basketball, Boomers, International Basketball
Similar posts:
- Bogey Man goes BOOM
- The NBA's Top 10 Aussie Ballers: An Australia Day Tribute
- Aussie Roundup - 24 January, 2010
- The Odyssey of the Australian NBA Fan
- End of the NBL?
« « Previous Post: Joe Default and his Merry Men
» » Next Post: Doubting Thomas Award – January Rankings









Andrew Bogut (MIL)
David Andersen (HOU)
Nathan Jawai (MIN)
Patrick Mills (POR)
14 Comments until now.
i think the problem is our best players are world-class, but our second tier is ordinary. a lot of that probably has to do with the state of our local league, which pales in comparison to the standard of euro leagues.
I’ve written a fair bit over on Aussiebball.com on exactly how the Boomers could put together a proper program that would challenge for a medal.
It is pretty simple – run it like the Socceroos program with multiple squads around the world combining together under a shared scheme and playing many games against whoever wants to play us – even at neutral sites. You put together a euro squad, a USA squad and a Australia squad – mix them up as scheduling allows and so on – you could have as many as 50-60 players who are part of the Boomers program with opportunities to understand the program, gain international squad experience and be part of what the Boomers could be.
In basketball national team program terms it would be somewhat revolutionary. I think it is exactly the sort of thing that could make the Boomers.
First thing’s first… drop the name Boomers. It’s a National embarrassment.
Secondly, find another way to keep Smiths Crisps and Australia Post happy via sponsorship so they do NOT feature on the uniforms.
The only “Boomers” players who have ever been taken seriously on the International scene are Patty Mills, Shane Heal and Andrew Gaze. Two of them because they had a “I don’t give a fck who you are” attitude and one of them purely on skill.
Bogut dogged it for the majority of the past Olympics when everyone was looking to him for leadership. I grant him the mulligan due mainly to his youth… but if he thinks he can get away with it in 2012 then he will forever be in my Basketball doghouse… regardless of his NBA achievements.
Australian Basketball needs to take a season off… do as the A-League did and re-invent itself with hype and hype only. Find some cash, (not easy I know) get some marquee imports out here, (along the lines of Trimmingham, D-Mac, Rob Rose, Ricky Grace) and put on a complete family-oriented show. Bring back the alley oop and anyone who can dunk as teams hitting 3’s all game is not entertainment.
At the moment, I would say that fcking SLAMBALL is bigger in Australia than the NBL.
I agree with Ray.
any post that simultaneously bags Sydney and the French gets my support
but in all seriousness, i agree that Australian Basketball has an identity crisis at the moment. Stemming from locally, and extended to the Boomers of course.
I also think that there’s a bit of a gulf between our “glitzy” NBA stars like Bogut, and the best of our local home-grown talent. It seems like the two sides don’t fully embrace each other. I seem to recall some bitter words between Bogut and Anstey a few years back.
Oh and Ray, if Slamball really is bigger in Australian than the NBL, then that is THE MOST depressing thing I have ever heard.
I disagree with pretty much everything Ray posted except for the whole reinvention thing – though they don’t need to take any time off for that – they just need to get it together and actually do it.
And it is hilarious that anyone associating themselves with Ray Borner wants ‘alley oop’ basketball. Ray couldn’t jump over the lines on the court.
Also a few alley oops are not the issue with the NBL or Aussie Basketball. I do agree the quality of imports has dropped off (since we don’t pay for the quality we need) to a point where there should be real debate on whether they are needed at all at the moment.
re: reinvention
It’s not about the quality of the basketball imports, it’s all about the entertainment factor. Like Ray said, guys shooting 3’s and really good basketball fundementals do not draw a crowd.
Dunks draw a crowd. Alley oops draw a crowd.
That’s why the NBA went the route of making rules to clear out the lane and the key so guys could get to the basket with minimal defense.
Defensive 3 seconds, the semi circle no-charge thing (yes that’s the technical name for it), both designed with one intention, to increase the amount of slamajamabingbong that goes on in a game.
The result? more crowds, more money.
Take note NBL.
i dont think its really complicated. we dont produce enough players with the height/athleticism combination to make local basketball remotely interesting.
how often do the boomers actually play outside of the like the olympics / world champs? we occasionally play new zealand but thats all i can think of.
Dunks and alley oops don’t draw a crowd. Well maybe once – but it isn’t sustainable. If it did, we could just have a dunk contest every week and people would show up. It is garbage basketball and gets boring quickly. Watch a Euroleague game – massively entertaining – very little in terms of athletic open court dunks. The NBL has much bigger issues than lacking a few guys who can jump high.
I have to disagree – Australia DOES produce the athletes with height/athleticism and skills to put on a good basketball game. But the majority of our best players play in Europe or in the USA.
Yes – Boomers don’t play enough together and can’t in the current system. The players are too spread out to justify the travel to play New Zealand again. Which is why a soccer type program can work – lots of opportunities with players in interchagable squads across three areas.
Opportunities to put a team on the floor before say the Euro championships to help other countries in warm up prep games before the Euro Championship or similar.
I don’t feel like there’s anything wrong with Australian basketball aside from its current level of popularity and exposure. it’s being played at a high level by professionals in the NBL.
The NBL is still a teamwork-oriented league, and Australian basketball is taught as a team concept, much the same way as it is in Europe. The FIBA court dimensions mean the lane is more clogged up and there is less driving the lane and more passing around for the open shot, which is often a 3. One thing Aussie players are taught to do well is shoot the ball – just about every NBL player can shoot it – which is not actually the case even in the NBA, especially among the more athletic players. I see nothing wrong with playing to your natural strengths. The whole 1 on 1 streetball thing is no where near as socially ingrained in basketball here either, so often there’s less flashy ball-handling too, but again NBA court dimensions make 1 on 1 play a bit more possible – Chris Paul has said he actually finds the NBA easier than college for this reason – and there’s more space for pick and roll plays and backdoor cuts for alleyoops etc, plus they’ve got more athleticism for that stuff.
But really, America is all about individual success, star-power, domination, it’s built into their culture and likewise into US basketball culture, so you see more individual efforts. But we’ve seen over the last 10 years the return to team ball in the US because of the success of teams like the Spurs, who many consider to be boring, and perhaps this even concerns NBA management. It’s also easy to forget that even the NBA is struggling in some regards – some of the teams are still very low profile, don’t have solid TV rights and barely – if ever – appear on national TV unless they’re playing a top tier team, a problem we’re very familiar with.
But having gone to many NBL games i would say that the crowds ultimately just love teams hitting their shots – 3s included – and they appreciate hustle and energy. They want to see clean plays and strong teamwork. Ultimately they want to see wins and feel team spirit. There’s lots of talented young players in this league who may get a chance to represent Australia in the future. Perhaps there’s no real commonality between the best Australian players at the moment, but you’ve still got to choose your best players, and the trick is devising a system that plays to some of the core strengths of the group – which I though Brian Gorjian did a pretty good job of – and perhaps developing the roles of the core returning players over time.
Have to agree completly with Ben. How can we have people bemoan the lack of international success on one hand and then look to turn our national league into an and 1 tournament on the other?
What about a Orlando type system, which when it works is pretty freakin sweet, where by we have one big in the block a pretty sweet PG and three David Anderson shooters/recbounders around them?
Oh and 1 more thing. The A-League only really took off in a big way here with the world cup qualification success. So, it stands to reason that with a successful basketball team on the international level we mightn’t have to change the way the national league is played and the crowds might come back.
You’ll also notice that the Socceroos ‘A’ Team comprises ALL overseas based players starting the game with maybe one or two A-League bench guys… But then in the lesser tourneys there is a lot of development and A-League people gaining experience in a Socceroos shirt. That is the way to develop experience and a team.
Right now with a totally healthy team there is maybe only ONE current NBL player who can expect to make the Boomers world cup team next year and that is (love him or hate him) Mark Worthington. There might be one or two other players with outside chances based on availability and injuries.
@marriard:
I am definitely intrigued by your idea. My devil’s advocate counters would be this;
- Are there really enough guys in Europe/US (the US particularly) that warrant national selection?
- In soccer, you can implement the same structures/tactics with different sets of guys with reasonable success. In basketball, this could be difficult.
E.g. I’d expect the Boomers A-team to feed the BogeyMan at every opportunity. But if I’m a guard on the NBL-based national team, and my pivot men are mostly soft jumpshooters, what’s my play?
If I don’t feed them and play an NBL style of ball, we essentially end up with the different national squads playing different styles, so that achieves little.
If I do feed them (assuming they ever venture into the low post), we’re bound to lose games, which will hurt team confidence.
Is there a middle ground to be found?
Comment!